标题: SETI在BOINC和CLASSIC的区别
macross11
论坛担当
Rank: 4



UID 6927
精华 0
积分 541
帖子 271
阅读权限 10
注册 2005-8-31
发表于 2005-9-16 17:34  资料  短消息  加为好友  添加 macross11 为MSN好友 通过MSN和 macross11 交谈 QQ
SETI在BOINC和CLASSIC的区别

在二者的图形显示界面的数据信息栏中,CLASSIC会标识数据来自阿雷西博射电望远镜,但BOINC就没有标明。这是不是说明目前在BOINC上进行的已经不是阿雷西博的数据了?

顶部
[广告] 请在发帖时选择合适的主题分类
Youth
管理员
Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7
勿忘国耻~振兴中华



UID 1613
精华 33
积分 10223
帖子 9870
阅读权限 102
注册 2004-6-30
来自 上海
发表于 2005-9-18 20:21  资料  主页 短消息  加为好友 
数据源还是一样的,虽然没标出来:)





欢迎所有 BOINC 用户加入 Team China 团队 | my Stats | Panda loves BOINC ~~
顶部
hamill
新手上路
Rank: 1



UID 6977
精华 0
积分 10
帖子 10
阅读权限 10
注册 2005-9-1
来自 江苏南京
发表于 2005-9-18 22:50  资料  短消息  加为好友 
好像都是03、04年记录的信息





[img]http://www.boincsynergy.com/images/stats/comb-2442.jpg[/img] [img]http://hamill.zj.com/mysig.jpg[/img]
顶部
Phoenix
论坛知事
Rank: 3Rank: 3Rank: 3



UID 99
精华 0
积分 264
帖子 237
阅读权限 10
注册 2003-11-25
来自 Beijing
发表于 2005-9-19 17:55  资料  主页 短消息  加为好友 
不知道澳大利亚的那个天文台现在是不是已经开始SETI信号收集工作





[img]http://boinc.mundayweb.com/one/stats.php?userID=2413[/img]
顶部
碧城仙
管理员
Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7



UID 403
精华 55
积分 8867
帖子 8153
阅读权限 102
注册 2004-1-24
来自 上海
发表于 2005-9-19 18:34  资料  主页 短消息  加为好友  QQ


QUOTE:
引用 Phoenix 在 2005-9-19 17:55 时的帖子:
不知道澳大利亚的那个天文台现在是不是已经开始SETI信号收集工作

SETI 澳大利亚中心网站 详细介绍
http://www.equn.com/forum/viewthread.php?tid=4515





快是快乐的一半,快乐才是计算的全部。坚持计算,让每一天都充满希望。
癌症研究相关项目:Folding@home、Rosetta@home、Help Conquer Cancer(WCG)、Cels@Home
顶部
Youth
管理员
Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7
勿忘国耻~振兴中华



UID 1613
精华 33
积分 10223
帖子 9870
阅读权限 102
注册 2004-6-30
来自 上海
发表于 2005-9-20 10:18  资料  主页 短消息  加为好友 
为什么03年的数据还在算?

Okay. I must have answered this in three other threads pertaining to this same topic already. But perhaps let me add a little more info this time that may shed light on the '03 data.

Data tapes come from Arecibo and end up in a pile next to my desk. We have, on average, a backlog of about 6 months' worth of tapes to split into workunits. There's no care taken to keep these tapes in chronological order (there's no need to, and there's better things to worry about). When it comes time to make more workunits, I grab a random tape.

This stuff I already mentioned elsewhere. BUT! There's more: We do actually check the quality of the data before throwing it into the splitter - we don't want to make a bunch of workunits with excessive RFI, or machine noise because the telescope was under maintenance, etc. Basically every two hours we compare the current spectrum we are recording against what we'd expect to see, and if it's WAY off, we probably have garbage data (so WAY off that we are positively not throwing out ET signals but obvious earth noise clobbering the relatively quiet noise from space).

Back in 2003 we had our large backlog of data, so we had a chance to be more selective with our tapes, not splitting anything that had the chance of being bad data. So a lot of 2003 tapes never made the cut at that time. Since then, we have determined that perhaps we were being a bit too selective - some of the data checks were failing the same time every day (perhaps this was a reflection of sun position affecting our receiver - I'll leave that up to the real scientists around here to decide). I was also cutting tapes when it failed a data check 1 time out 8, thus "throwing away" 87.5% of good data because 12.5% seemed squirly.

But of course we keep these tapes around, so this data wasn't actually thrown away - just settling to the bottom of my data tape box for later reconsideration.

That's all.

- Matt





欢迎所有 BOINC 用户加入 Team China 团队 | my Stats | Panda loves BOINC ~~
顶部
 



当前时区 GMT+8, 现在时间是 2009-1-10 06:48
沪ICP备05042587号

本论坛支付平台由支付宝提供
携手打造安全诚信的交易社区 Powered by Discuz! 5.5.0 © 2001-2007 Comsenz Inc.
清除 Cookies - 联系我们 - 中国分布式计算总站 - Archiver - WAP