找回密码
 新注册用户
搜索
查看: 18691|回复: 41

[转帖] 2600K dedicated bigadv build w/pics@4900Mhz

  [复制链接]
发表于 2011-1-9 22:22:43 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
本帖最后由 金鹏 于 2011-3-10 14:03 编辑

转个沙桥2600K跑BIGADV的强悍数据,顺便对比一下老I7平台数据,看来新I7性能提升不少啊

bigadv.png


smp2.png

I have managed a highest clock of 5.1Ghz @ 1.450vcore, but temps hit 80`c when folding.

Higest clock for these benchmarks will be 4.9Ghz, @ 1.375vcore, ddr3-1600. Temps mid 70`s.

SMP results are in for P6074. Only multiplyer and vcore changed between the runs. Minimum 6 frames per run.

BIGADV preliminary results for P6900

I will test a few different smp WU's down the road. Onto a 6900 now. This of course will take some more time, but will update thread and this post when I am done them.


My 2600K overclocking observations to date for those interested in OC info:

2600K D2 stepping, batch L038A660
Asus P8P67
Corsair 4GB(2x2) DDR3 1600Mhz C8
Corsair H50 w/one Scythe Kaze 1900rpm

running open air bench setup, extra fan over mosfet heatsinks

Firstly, my P8P67 board shipped with bios version 0408, which isn't even listed on the ASUS site. With this bios max OC was 4560MHZ, and IIRC 1.285vcore, LLC max, all other settings stock or auto. This was acheived with lowering bclock to 97 and multi at 47. No matter how much more vcore I supplied I could not reach any higher.

I updated to bios beta version 1053, which enables CPU internal PLL overvoltage, this has so far allowed me to get all the way up to 5.1Ghz.

Many reviews and talk about SB speaks of how much better it OC's with less voltage and less heat. So far the voltage aspect has proven true, requiring 1.45 for 5.1Ghz. Temps are also great up till 4.7 but start going up exponentially afterwards.

Vcore requirements thus far, up to 4.9Ghz I'm good with 1.375v, however to boot 5.0, 5.1 and 5.2 all required 1.450v, nothing less. This caused temps to rise up to 80`c under load, so I have not done any testing other then boot stable and running fah for about one minute.

I'll add to this as I think of things and tinker more.

http://www.overclock.net/overclo ... v-build-w-pics.html





bigadv folding comparison i7 920 vs i7 2600k
i7 920 bigadv rig:
ASRock x58 Extreme
i7 920
G.Skill Ripjaws pc3-12800 (1600 Mhz)
Seasonic X650

Overclock: 4015 Mhz (21x191) 1.248v, 67*C
Power Draw: 147w cpu only (per hwmonitor)
Folding: -bigadv -8
Project 6900 | TPF 32 mins | 33.6K PPD | 228.5 PPD/w
Retail Cost (chip only): $284
-------------------------------------
i7 2600K bigadv rig:
Asus P67 Pro
i7 2600K
G.Skill Ripjaws pc3-12800 (1600 Mhz)
Seasonic x750

Overclock: 4500 Mhz (50x100), 1.296v, 60*C
Power Draw: 87w cpu only (per hwmonitor)
Folding: -bigadv -8
Project 6900 | TPF 27 mins | 43.4K PPD | 498.9 PPD/w
Retail Cost (chip only): $317
---------------------------------------
It's not a even comparison since I cannot get my 920 chip to 4.5 Ghz on air. However the comparison gives you an idea of what a older i7 900 series chip vs newer i7 2600 series chip can do. The points per day per watt calculation was based purely on the wattage the cpu was using, not the wattage it's drawing from the wall.

i7 920 Pro's: fairly inexpensive now, good overclocker
i7 920 Con's: higher energy consumption, runs a tad hot

i7 2600k Pro's: great overclocker, lower energy consumption
i7 2600k Con's: higher initial cost

My observation as a folder, I think the i7 2600k in the long run is best bang for the buck when considering the initial release cost of both chips. You can achieve higher PPD for lower power consumption. As a 24/7 folder, every little bit of power savings helps!

I'm cooling the H50's rad through a window, pulling in -10`C air. Clocked at 5.0Ghz and running 68`C. Vcore of 1.48 and power consumption up to 245 watts.

CODE: SELECT ALL
Name: 2600K
Path: \\2600K\Users\Jay\Desktop\5000 MHZ\
Number of Frames Observed: 300

Min. Time / Frame : 00:23:43 - 53,322 PPD
Avg. Time / Frame : 00:25:04 - 49,073 PPD
Cur. Time / Frame : 00:23:46 - 52,669 PPD
R3F. Time / Frame : 00:23:45 - 52,706 PPD
All  Time / Frame : 00:23:44 - 52,743 PPD
Eff. Time / Frame : 00:24:33 - 50,989 PPD

Project: 6901
Average time/frame: 00:25:58 (over first 5 frames)
CPU: i7 2600K @ 4.1GHz
# of CPU sockets: 1
# of Physical cores: 4

# of FAH CPU processes: 8
# of FAH GPU Clients: 0

RAM GB installed: 8 (2x4GB)
RAM Type: DDR3
RAM Speed: 1333MHz 9-9-9-24-2T
NUMA: N/A

Project: P6901
Average time/frame: 00:23:48 - 53,000PPD
CPU: 2600k @ 4.7 GHz
# of CPU sockets:1
# of Physical cores:4

# of FAH CPU processes:8
# of FAH GPU Clients:0

RAM GB installed:4
RAM Type: DDR3
RAM Speed: 2133MHz 7-10-8-27 1T
NUMA: not used

OS name/kernel version: win 7 ultimate x64
Client: 6.34
Running in VM: NO
Dedicated: YES

Project: p6901
Average time/frame: 00:22:45 {in hh:mm:ss}
CPU: i7 2600K @ 4.60 GHz
# of CPU sockets: 1
# of Physical cores: 4

# of FAH CPU processes: 8
# of FAH GPU Clients: 0

RAM GB installed: 4
RAM Type: DDR3
RAM Speed: DDR3-1600 @ 8-8-8-24, dual-channel
NUMA enabled/disabled/not used: not used

OS name/kernel version: Ubuntu 10.10 2.6.35-25
Client: Linux 6.34 64 bit
Running in VM: No

评分

参与人数 1基本分 +6 收起 理由
caozhonghua + 6 我很赞同

查看全部评分

回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2011-1-9 22:30:27 | 显示全部楼层
强大。

金大不是败了个2600老K吧?
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2011-1-9 22:39:33 | 显示全部楼层
回复 2# Atom2004

看测试数据2600K可以挑战I7 970了,是跑BIGADV的利器啊,
就是不知道价格上如何啊,有折腾一下的想法
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2011-1-9 22:50:48 | 显示全部楼层
回复  Atom2004

看测试数据2600K可以挑战I7 970了,是跑BIGADV的利器啊,
就是不知道价格上如何啊,有折 ...
金鹏 发表于 2011-1-9 22:39


非常有看头。不过关键是彪4.9要多少电压,能不能长期跑(我个人觉得有难度)。4.5 4.6长期跑应该还可以。

价钱估计要2500左右吧。没K的可能2100~2200吧。

不知道970多少米呢。

金大现在用啥U啊?
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2011-1-9 22:52:38 | 显示全部楼层
呵呵 32NM果然厉害 不过又要买U还要换板 三思吧!!!
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2011-1-9 23:33:21 | 显示全部楼层
估计4.9G 的也就跑跑几个小时还行。

我手上的32 um 的6核  E5645,  长期跑只能3.8G , i7 970  32um 长期跑也是3.75G 左右。估计真要跑4G以上的话,需要上水冷等设备。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2011-1-10 08:19:57 | 显示全部楼层
观望一下,还是价格出来再说吧
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2011-1-10 11:47:19 | 显示全部楼层
U已经上市了 2300元 不过主板死贵 都要1500以上
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2011-1-10 12:08:42 | 显示全部楼层
U已经上市了 2300元 不过主板死贵 都要1500以上
vennyfan 发表于 2011-1-10 11:47


香港賣的主板一般一千二百人民幣左右.
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2011-1-10 13:16:15 | 显示全部楼层
看参数二代i7还带显示核心,只支持双通道了,不知道对性能有没有影响。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2011-1-10 14:19:22 | 显示全部楼层
回复 9# ocw

呵呵 天朝水比较深!还有就是新品上市3把火!口水一下HK的算友!!!

最近收了2片X58 只要700左右 比较超值!!! 3通道还是有优势的
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2011-1-10 14:23:51 | 显示全部楼层
2600k 要發揮最好的性能, 好像要用 d3-2133 的 內存, 2x2g 要八百塊.
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2011-1-10 15:01:32 | 显示全部楼层
回复 4# Atom2004

刚上市价格不会那么便宜吧
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2011-1-10 15:01:59 | 显示全部楼层
回复 5# vennyfan

这个的确需要比较后三思
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2011-1-10 15:04:49 | 显示全部楼层
回复 6# maxzong

沙桥的U应该比970等功耗发热控制的更好,貌似测试的人用的贼船H50,相当于高端风冷压制,我估计4.5G风冷能长期稳定运行。

兄弟的E5645和970跑6900大概多少PPD?我想参考一下
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 新注册用户

本版积分规则

论坛官方淘宝店开业啦~

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|中国分布式计算总站 ( 沪ICP备05042587号 )

GMT+8, 2024-4-20 01:01

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2024 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表